Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (209)



 


 



Comparative Procedure on a Sunday Afternoon: Instant Replay in the NFL as a Process of Appellate Review


Chad M. Oldfather


Marquette University - Law School

Matthew M. Fernholz


Marquette University - Law School

August 25, 2009

Indiana Law Review, Vol. 43, p. 45, 2009
Marquette Law School Legal Studies Paper No. 09-32

Abstract:     
During his confirmation hearings, Chief Justice John Roberts famously likened the judicial role to that of a baseball umpire. The increased prevalence of video evidence makes it likely that judges will find another sporting analogue for their role – that of the instant replay official in the NFL. (Indeed, many have already done so.) This Essay explores the analogy. In so doing it seeks not only to consider its appropriateness in a narrow sense (much as many commentators considered the appropriateness of the Chief Justice’s analogy), but also to conduct something of a comparative analysis and thereby to use it as a vehicle for illustrating some general characteristics of a process of decisional review.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 35

Keywords: instant replay, NFL, national football league, appellate, standard of review

JEL Classification: K4, K40, K41

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 26, 2009 ; Last revised: December 15, 2009

Suggested Citation

Oldfather, Chad M. and Fernholz, Matthew M., Comparative Procedure on a Sunday Afternoon: Instant Replay in the NFL as a Process of Appellate Review (August 25, 2009). Indiana Law Review, Vol. 43, p. 45, 2009; Marquette Law School Legal Studies Paper No. 09-32. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1461427

Contact Information

Chad M. Oldfather (Contact Author)
Marquette University - Law School ( email )
Eckstein Hall
P.O. Box 1881
Milwaukee, WI 53201
United States
414.288.8031 (Phone)
Matthew M. Fernholz
Marquette University - Law School ( email )
Eckstein Hall
P.O. Box 1881
Milwaukee, WI 53201
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,820
Downloads: 226
Download Rank: 65,997
Footnotes:  209

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.999 seconds