Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1461680
 
 

Footnotes (65)



 


 



Summum and the Establishment Clause


Bernadette A. Meyler


Stanford Law School

August, 25 2009

Northwestern University Law Review Colloquy, Vol 104, p. 95, 2009
Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 09-028

Abstract:     
This Symposium Essay assesses the compatibility of the U.S. Supreme Court's recent Free Speech Clause-based decision in Pleasant Grove v. Summum with extant Establishment Clause jurisprudence. The Essay first examines why, based on prior state and federal decisions, a free speech challenge to Pleasant Grove's policy of retaining a Ten Commandments monument while excluding the alternative display Summum wished to erect may have seemed more likely to succeed than a religious liberty one. It then posits that the Supreme Court's resulting neglect of the Establishment Clause implications of the case may result in future conflicts between the religion clauses -- and, in particular, the emerging emphasis on equality in religion clause adjudication -- and the position on government speech that the Court staked out in Summum.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 15

Keywords: religion, First Amendment, Ten Commandments, equality

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 26, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Meyler, Bernadette A., Summum and the Establishment Clause (August, 25 2009). Northwestern University Law Review Colloquy, Vol 104, p. 95, 2009; Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 09-028. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1461680

Contact Information

Bernadette A. Meyler (Contact Author)
Stanford Law School ( email )
559 Nathan Abbott Way
Stanford, CA 94305-8610
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 471
Downloads: 58
Download Rank: 216,288
Footnotes:  65

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.312 seconds