|
||||
|
||||
Summum and the Establishment ClauseBernadette A. MeylerCornell University - School of Law August, 25 2009 Northwestern University Law Review Colloquy, Vol 104, p. 95, 2009 Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 09-028 Abstract: This Symposium Essay assesses the compatibility of the U.S. Supreme Court's recent Free Speech Clause-based decision in Pleasant Grove v. Summum with extant Establishment Clause jurisprudence. The Essay first examines why, based on prior state and federal decisions, a free speech challenge to Pleasant Grove's policy of retaining a Ten Commandments monument while excluding the alternative display Summum wished to erect may have seemed more likely to succeed than a religious liberty one. It then posits that the Supreme Court's resulting neglect of the Establishment Clause implications of the case may result in future conflicts between the religion clauses -- and, in particular, the emerging emphasis on equality in religion clause adjudication -- and the position on government speech that the Court staked out in Summum.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 15 Keywords: religion, First Amendment, Ten Commandments, equality Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: August 26, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.407 seconds