Summum and the Establishment Clause
Bernadette A. Meyler
Stanford Law School
August, 25 2009
Northwestern University Law Review Colloquy, Vol 104, p. 95, 2009
Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 09-028
This Symposium Essay assesses the compatibility of the U.S. Supreme Court's recent Free Speech Clause-based decision in Pleasant Grove v. Summum with extant Establishment Clause jurisprudence. The Essay first examines why, based on prior state and federal decisions, a free speech challenge to Pleasant Grove's policy of retaining a Ten Commandments monument while excluding the alternative display Summum wished to erect may have seemed more likely to succeed than a religious liberty one. It then posits that the Supreme Court's resulting neglect of the Establishment Clause implications of the case may result in future conflicts between the religion clauses -- and, in particular, the emerging emphasis on equality in religion clause adjudication -- and the position on government speech that the Court staked out in Summum.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 15
Keywords: religion, First Amendment, Ten Commandments, equalityAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: August 26, 2009
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.406 seconds