Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (65)



 


 



Summum and the Establishment Clause


Bernadette A. Meyler


Cornell University - School of Law

August, 25 2009

Northwestern University Law Review Colloquy, Vol 104, p. 95, 2009
Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 09-028

Abstract:     
This Symposium Essay assesses the compatibility of the U.S. Supreme Court's recent Free Speech Clause-based decision in Pleasant Grove v. Summum with extant Establishment Clause jurisprudence. The Essay first examines why, based on prior state and federal decisions, a free speech challenge to Pleasant Grove's policy of retaining a Ten Commandments monument while excluding the alternative display Summum wished to erect may have seemed more likely to succeed than a religious liberty one. It then posits that the Supreme Court's resulting neglect of the Establishment Clause implications of the case may result in future conflicts between the religion clauses -- and, in particular, the emerging emphasis on equality in religion clause adjudication -- and the position on government speech that the Court staked out in Summum.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 15

Keywords: religion, First Amendment, Ten Commandments, equality

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 26, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Meyler, Bernadette A., Summum and the Establishment Clause (August, 25 2009). Northwestern University Law Review Colloquy, Vol 104, p. 95, 2009; Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 09-028. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1461680

Contact Information

Bernadette A. Meyler (Contact Author)
Cornell University - School of Law ( email )
524 College Ave
Ithaca, NY 14853
United States
607-255-6045 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 424
Downloads: 53
Download Rank: 194,887
Footnotes:  65

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.407 seconds