Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1462380
 


 



Watching Your Step: Avoiding the Pitfalls and Perils of Corporate Internal Investigations


Paul B. Murphy


affiliation not provided to SSRN

Lucian E. Dervan


Southern Illinois University School of Law

August, 26 2009

Loss Prevention Journal, Vol. XVI, No. 2, Summer 2005

Abstract:     
Since the creation of the Corporate Fraud Task Force in July 2002, the United States Department of Justice and the other member agencies have worked feverishly to ferret out corporate crime and punish wrongdoers. The Task Force, in the three years following the announcement of its formation by President Bush, has instituted hundreds of investigations, secured over five hundred corporate fraud convictions or guilty pleas, and charged over nine hundred defendants. Not to be outdone by federal law enforcement authorities, some state attorneys general have followed suit, pursuing their own well-publicized probes of corporate practices. The stakes in these investigations are enormously high, not just for the individuals whose conduct comes under review, but also for the corporations themselves. Corporations risk substantial criminal fines and civil penalties, and they often must endure a host of investigation-related side effects such as a disruption of business and a diminution of market capitalization. The severity of these consequences, and the ease with which criminal liability can attach to an organization for the acts of employees within the scope of their authority, means that no responsible company can afford to ignore suspected wrongdoing within its ranks.

The government’s new focus on corporate America, in turn, has generated a sharp increase in the number of internal investigations. Today, perhaps more than ever, internal investigations are an integral part of the business landscape. In general, a corporation will undertake an internal investigation for one of two reasons. First, an internal investigation may be launched in response to a government inquiry, such as a grand jury subpoena or a letter of informal inquiry by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Second, a corporation may initiate an investigation to address an issue brought to its attention through internal means, such as an allegation of wrongdoing by an employee of the company or an issue identified by the company’s external auditor. As a result of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the obligations that it imposes on public corporations, these internally-sparked investigations have increased dramatically in the post-Enron business climate, so much so that “internal investigation attorneys are becoming a dreaded necessity for a growing number of public companies.”

Regardless of the event that triggers an internal investigation, attorneys engaged to handle this kind of matter for a corporation often confront complex issues unique to this practice area. To navigate these issues successfully requires a basic understanding of the ways in which missteps by counsel can compound the client’s problems and potentially undermine the engagement. This article offers certain key points to keep in mind when conducting an internal investigation, the consideration of which will better prepare counsel for the challenges that may surface and the pitfalls and perils that could lead to problems for both client and attorney.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 12

Keywords: Crime, White Collar Crime, Corporate Crime, Internal Investigation, Privilege, Waiver, Client, Conflict of Interest

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 28, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Murphy, Paul B. and Dervan, Lucian E., Watching Your Step: Avoiding the Pitfalls and Perils of Corporate Internal Investigations (August, 26 2009). Loss Prevention Journal, Vol. XVI, No. 2, Summer 2005. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1462380

Contact Information

Paul B. Murphy
affiliation not provided to SSRN
Lucian E. Dervan (Contact Author)
Southern Illinois University School of Law ( email )
Lesar Law Building
Carbondale, IL 62901
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 470
Downloads: 144
Download Rank: 114,010

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.297 seconds