Responding to Potential Employee Misconduct in the Age of the Whistleblower: Foreseeing and Avoiding Hidden Dangers

Lucian E. Dervan

Southern Illinois University School of Law

September 1, 2008

Corporate Law Journal, Vol. 3, No. 4, Fall 2008

The number of law suits brought against corporations in the United States as a result of employee whistleblowers has risen in recent years. There are two predominant reasons for this trend. First, publicity surrounding cases such as Enron in the early 2000s have made employees more sensitive to potential misconduct in the workplace. For instance, a 2007 study found that 56% of employees reported that they had observed conduct that “violated company ethics standards, policy, or the law” in the previous twelve months. Second, employees are now more aware of the role of whistleblowers and are more likely to report potential misconduct to outside entities rather than utilizing internal reporting mechanisms. According to a recent report from the Department of Justice, since 2001, 300 to 400 civil cases have been filed each year under the False Claims Act (“FCA”) by employees charging that their companies defrauded the government. Furthermore, in 2007 the Department of Justice recovered $1.45 billion in FCA whistleblower actions.

Once an employee has decided to become a whistleblower, the initial battle is lost. The challenge for corporations today, therefore, is to create an environment in which employees feel secure reporting potential misconduct through internal channels. This can only be achieved, however, by creating an investigative structure that ensures the reporting employee feels his or her concerns have been properly investigated and addressed. Furthermore, the corporation must respond to the employee’s complaint in a manner that does not lead the employee to believe he or she is being or will be retaliated against because of their actions.

This article focuses on these issues and the mechanisms by which corporations can greatly diminish the chances that an employee will become a whistleblower, while simultaneously creating a corporate culture of openness and trust that will increase employee morale and assist with the corporation’s overall compliance and ethics mission.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 6

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: August 27, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Dervan, Lucian E., Responding to Potential Employee Misconduct in the Age of the Whistleblower: Foreseeing and Avoiding Hidden Dangers (September 1, 2008). Corporate Law Journal, Vol. 3, No. 4, Fall 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1462455

Contact Information

Lucian E. Dervan (Contact Author)
Southern Illinois University School of Law ( email )
Lesar Law Building
Carbondale, IL 62901
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,173
Downloads: 130
Download Rank: 165,647

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 2.547 seconds