Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1463340
 
 

Footnotes (242)



 


 



Understanding the Federal Tort Claims Act: A Different Metaphor


Paul Figley


American University - Washington College of Law


Tort Trial & Insurance Practice Law Journal, Vol. 44, p. 1105, 2009
American University, WCL Research Paper No. 2009-25

Abstract:     
When it enacted the Federal Tort Claims Act Congress waived the United States’ sovereign immunity for certain torts of the federal government. That waiver is subject to exclusions, exceptions, and limitations that may seem puzzling or counterintuitive. This essay explains the structure and operation of the Federal Tort Claims Act by comparing it to “a traversable bridge across the moat of sovereign immunity” (a metaphor used by Judge Max Rosenn in a slightly different context). The essay examines why Congress enacted the FTCA, the jurisdictional grant that allows some tort claims but not others, the pre-requisites to bringing suit, the exceptions Congress wrote into the FTCA, and other statutes that limit tort suits against the United States.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 35

Keywords: Federal Tort Claims Act, Sovereign Immunity, FTCA

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 28, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Figley, Paul, Understanding the Federal Tort Claims Act: A Different Metaphor. Tort Trial & Insurance Practice Law Journal, Vol. 44, p. 1105, 2009 ; American University, WCL Research Paper No. 2009-25. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1463340

Contact Information

Paul Figley (Contact Author)
American University - Washington College of Law ( email )
4801 Massachusetts Avenue N.W.
Washington, DC 20016
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,039
Downloads: 173
Download Rank: 96,703
Footnotes:  242

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.954 seconds