Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1463866
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (162)



 


 



Race, Death and Disproportionality


Scott Howe


Chapman University, The Dale E. Fowler School of Law

September 12, 2009

Chapman University Law Research Paper No. 09-44

Abstract:     
Statistical studies showing unconscious racial bias in capital selection matter under the eighth amendment. In McCleskey v. Kemp, the Court appeared to shun such evidence as irrelevant to eighth amendment challenges to capital punishment. Yet, this kind of evidence has influenced many of the Justices' views on the constitutionality of the death penalty and has sometimes caused the Court to restrict the use of that sanction under the eighth amendment. My goal, therefore, is to explain why statistical studies concerning race bias in capital selection have limitations as proof but also strong suggestive power that some death sentences amount to 'cruel and unusual punishments'. Ultimately, I address how such studies, despite their limitations, might influence the Court in its regulation of the death penalty in the future.

My project proceeds in five parts. Part I contends that the eighth amendment regulates capital selection not, as is commonly asserted, through a consistency mandate but, instead, through a deserts limitation - a mandate that only a person who deserves the death penalty should receive that sanction. Part II shows how the capital selection process allows for multiple opportunities for reprieves of offenders who deserve the death penalty but also provides a two-phase trial to try to ensure that nobody receives a death sentence who does not deserve it. Part III briefly describes the statistical efforts to determine whether racial biases concerning defendants and victims influence decisions along the selection process. Part IV shows, however, why studies that do not focus on the capital sentencer have only limited eighth amendment meaning and why even studies that do have that focus cannot establish with much certainty that violations of the deserts limitation frequently occur. Statistical evidence of racial bias even at the sentencing trial might reflect mostly the effect of race in the dispensation of merciful reprieves. Yet, this Part also explains that such evidence can spur our intuitions that some sentencer findings of deserts underlying some death sentences, in addition to some reprieves, are racially influenced. In fact, Part V contends that, despite the Court's general unwillingness to acknowledge that racial-bias studies reveal that death sentences are sometimes disproportional, the studies have influenced the Court - and will continue to influence it - to confine the use of the death penalty.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 25

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: August 29, 2009 ; Last revised: November 10, 2009

Suggested Citation

Howe, Scott, Race, Death and Disproportionality (September 12, 2009). Chapman University Law Research Paper No. 09-44. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1463866 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1463866

Contact Information

Scott Howe (Contact Author)
Chapman University, The Dale E. Fowler School of Law ( email )
One University Drive
Orange, CA 92866-1099
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,140
Downloads: 186
Download Rank: 97,830
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  162

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.328 seconds