Recovering Bonuses After Restated Financials: Adopting Clawback Provisions
Noel D. Addy Jr.
Mississippi State University - Adkerson School of Accountancy
Louisiana Tech University - School of Professional Accountancy
Timothy R. Yoder
University of Nebraska at Omaha
August 29, 2009
We investigate the emergence of provisions to recover bonuses made in the event of restated financials. These provisions are sometimes termed 'clawbacks.' Errant financial statements, and associated bonuses, have made headlines and the SEC recently changed Regulation S-K to require that compensation committees disclose their policies regarding bonus recovery in the event of errant financial statements. Some, but not all, companies quickly developed policies to recover (clawback) bonuses. We construct an index of the relative influence of management and independent monitoring on governance. We find that management influence (reflected as a low index) makes a clawback provision less likely. On the other hand, more independent monitoring (as reflected in a high index) increases the likelihood of a company adopting a clawback provision. Higher noise in the accounting system makes a clawback less likely and if the risk of restatements has been high recently then a clawback provision is more likely. Accounting conservatism does not appear to be a factor in the presence or absence of clawback provisions.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 49
Keywords: accounting contracting, clawbacks, management compensation
JEL Classification: M41
Date posted: August 29, 2009 ; Last revised: May 19, 2011
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.266 seconds