'In Short He is a Stupid Man': The Judges and the Arbitration Court, 1891-1928
Daniel R. Ernst
Georgetown University Law Center
August 31, 2009
Turnbull Library Record, Vol. 29, pp. 59-78, 1996
Georgetown Public Law Research Paper No. 1465034
In the 1890s, New Zealand legislators established the Arbitration Court as an ad hoc system for settling industrial disputes; by the mid-twentieth century the Court had become a pillar of New Zealand's welfare state. This transformation did not proceed smoothly, however, because of a mismatch between the mission and its managers. The judges who presided over the court were more interested in legal principles and forensic debate than the bargains of workers and their employers. They considered their tenure as a purgatory to be endured until they were promoted to full-time service on the New Zealand Supreme Court. This mismatch resulted because the Court evolved into an institution that differed from the founders' intent and because a dearth of other professionals left only the judiciary as a vehicle for putting the resolution of industrial disputes beyond the reach of partisan politics.
This article is reproduced by kind permission of the Friends of the Turnbull Library, Wellington, New Zealand (www.turnbullfriends.org.nz).
Number of Pages in PDF File: 21
Keywords: Labor, Courts, New Zealand
JEL Classification: J52, K33Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: September 4, 2009 ; Last revised: September 10, 2009
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 1.313 seconds