|
||||
|
||||
Has Goodwill Accounting Gone Bad?Kevin K. LiUniversity of Toronto - Rotman School of Management Richard G. SloanUniversity of California at Berkeley - Haas School of Business September 1, 2009 CAAA Annual Conference 2011 Abstract: Prior to SFAS 142, goodwill was subject to periodic amortization and a recoverability-based impairment test. SFAS 142 eliminates periodic amortization and imposes a more stringent periodic fair-value-based impairment test. We examine the impact of this standard on the accounting for and valuation of goodwill. Our results indicate that the new standard results in relatively inflated goodwill balances and untimely impairments. We also find that investors do not appear to fully anticipate the untimely nature of post SFAS 142 goodwill impairments. Overall, our results suggest that managers exploit the discretion afforded by SFAS 142 to delay goodwill impairments, causing earnings and stock prices to be temporarily inflated.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 52 Keywords: goodwill impairment, SFAS 142, accounting discretion, fair value accounting, resource misallocation JEL Classification: G14, M41, M48 working papers seriesDate posted: September 3, 2009 ; Last revised: February 20, 2013Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.844 seconds