Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1466875
 
 

Footnotes (243)



 


 



The Exportability of the Principles of Software: Lost in Translation?


Michael L. Rustad


Suffolk University Law School; Stetson University - College of Law

Maria Vittoria Onufrio


Center for the Study of Women - UCLA

2010

Hastings Science & Technology Law Journal, Vol. 2, p. 25, 2010
Stetson University College of Law Research Paper No. 2009-03
Suffolk University Law School Research Paper No. 09-45

Abstract:     
The American Law Institute approval of The Principles of Software Contracts is a significant milestone in the history of software law. The project began in 2004 because of the flaws of the Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act concerning this issue, problems strengthened by the widely held perception that the law at the time was “undeveloped, confused, and conflicting.” Software licensing is presently America’s third largest industry and has suffered from the mechanical extension of the law of sales to software over the last forty years, much like courts imported “horse and buggy law” to resolve problems posed by the automobile. Thankfully, the Principles achieve the objective of bringing common sense to the common law of software contracts. However, the project is heavily centered on the United States with limited exportability to the European Union in its current form. This piece looks at the path of software contracting law over the past twenty years, the Principles of Software Contracts itself, and its exportability to the rest of the world, particularly the European Union.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 58

Keywords: principles of software contracts, software contracts, american law institute, uniform commerical code, soft law, statutory approach

JEL Classification: K10, K12

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 6, 2009 ; Last revised: March 3, 2012

Suggested Citation

Rustad, Michael L. and Onufrio, Maria Vittoria, The Exportability of the Principles of Software: Lost in Translation? (2010). Hastings Science & Technology Law Journal, Vol. 2, p. 25, 2010; Stetson University College of Law Research Paper No. 2009-03; Suffolk University Law School Research Paper No. 09-45. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1466875 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1466875

Contact Information

Michael L. Rustad (Contact Author)
Suffolk University Law School ( email )
120 Tremont Street
Boston, MA 02108-4977
United States

Stetson University - College of Law ( email )
1401 61st Street South
Gulfport, FL 33707
United States
Maria Vittoria Onufrio
Center for the Study of Women - UCLA ( email )
Public Affairs 1500
Los Angeles, CA
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,089
Downloads: 149
Download Rank: 114,641
Footnotes:  243

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.297 seconds