The Exportability of the Principles of Software: Lost in Translation?
Michael L. Rustad
Suffolk University Law School
Maria Vittoria Onufrio
Center for the Study of Women - UCLA
Hastings Science & Technology Law Journal, Vol. 2, p. 25, 2010
Stetson University College of Law Research Paper No. 2009-03
Suffolk University Law School Research Paper No. 09-45
The American Law Institute approval of The Principles of Software Contracts is a significant milestone in the history of software law. The project began in 2004 because of the flaws of the Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act concerning this issue, problems strengthened by the widely held perception that the law at the time was “undeveloped, confused, and conflicting.” Software licensing is presently America’s third largest industry and has suffered from the mechanical extension of the law of sales to software over the last forty years, much like courts imported “horse and buggy law” to resolve problems posed by the automobile. Thankfully, the Principles achieve the objective of bringing common sense to the common law of software contracts. However, the project is heavily centered on the United States with limited exportability to the European Union in its current form. This piece looks at the path of software contracting law over the past twenty years, the Principles of Software Contracts itself, and its exportability to the rest of the world, particularly the European Union.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 58
Keywords: principles of software contracts, software contracts, american law institute, uniform commerical code, soft law, statutory approach
JEL Classification: K10, K12
Date posted: September 6, 2009 ; Last revised: March 3, 2012
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 2.297 seconds