Penumbral Academic Freedom: Interpreting the Tenure Contract in a Time of Constitutional Impotence
Richard J. Peltz-Steele
University of Massachusetts School of Law at Dartmouth
August 16, 2009
Journal of College and University Law, Vol. 37, p. 159, 2010
This article recounts the deficiencies of constitutional law and common tenure contract language - the latter based on the 1940 Statement of Principles of the American Association of University Professors - in protecting the academic freedom of faculty on the modern university campus. The article proposes an Interpretation of that common language, accompanied by Illustrations, aiming to describe the penumbras of academic freedom - faculty rights and responsibilities that surround and emanate from the three traditional pillars of teaching, research, and service - that are within the scope of the tenure contract but not explicitly described by it, and therefore too readily subject to neglectful interpretation. This proposal means thus to provide more comprehensive protection for academic freedom at a time when the constitutional concept is near defunct, and thus more broadly to realize, through proper understanding of the written tenure contract, the ideal of the university as the quintessential marketplace of ideas.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 27
Keywords: penumbral, penumbra, academic freedom, tenure, contract, university, college, higher education, education, law, first amendment, professor, employment, AAUP, Statement of Principles, faculty
JEL Classification: L30, L31, L32, L39, I20, I28, I29Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: September 3, 2009 ; Last revised: October 21, 2011
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.407 seconds