The Shadow Terms: Contract Procedure and Unilateral Amendments
University of California, Davis - School of Law
September 3, 2009
UCLA Law Review, Vol. 57, 2010
Loyola-LA Legal Studies Paper No. 2009-31
For decades, courts and commentators have debated the normative implications of contract procedure. Conservatives argue that mandatory arbitration clauses reduce the burden on the judicial system and that class arbitration waivers, choice-of-law clauses, and jury trial waivers allow businesses to pass their litigation savings to consumers in the form of lower prices. In response, liberals object that contract procedure dilutes substantive rights and runs roughshod over important jurisdictional and constitutional values.
This Article argues that neither view has accounted for a defining trait of contract procedure: The regularity with which drafters unilaterally amend procedural terms. Indeed, many standard form consumer agreements and a growing number of state statutes authorize drafters to revise procedural terms unilaterally. The frequency with which drafters exercise this power undermines the foundational conservative theory that sophisticated adherents can exert market pressure on drafters to offer efficient procedural terms. However, the liberal model of contract procedure - which urges courts to nullify procedural terms that erode substantive, jurisdictional, or constitutional interests - creates perverse incentives. Drafters respond to judicial decisions voiding procedural terms by amending their terms again. The target audience for these revisions is not the adherents who will be subject to them, but the courts who will adjudicate their validity. This “private conversation” between corporations and courts not only widens the informational gulf between drafters and adherents, but increases the burden on the judicial system. To end this pernicious feedback loop, the Article encourages policymakers to eliminate drafters’ ability to amend procedural terms unilaterally.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 63
Keywords: contract procedure, unilateral modification, arbitration, class arbitration waiver, jury trial waiverAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: September 3, 2009 ; Last revised: April 6, 2010
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.438 seconds