Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1467910
 


 



The Silliest Rule of Professional Conduct: Model Rule 5.2(b)


Andrew M. Perlman


Suffolk University Law School

September 3, 2009

The Professional Lawyer, Vol. 19, No. 3, p. 14, 2009

Abstract:     
Rule 5.2(b) provides that a subordinate attorney should not be disciplined for her conduct as long as she has complied with “a supervisory lawyer's reasonable resolution of an arguable question of professional duty.” This short essay contends that the rule confers few, if any, tangible benefits and has some potentially significant costs. In particular, the Rule applies in so few cases that it is difficult to construct a suitable hypothetical to which it would apply. And in cases where the Rule might apply, it is hard to see why a subordinate should escape liability for following unethical instructions. Finally, the Rule produces substantial costs by giving subordinate attorneys a justification to defer to authority figures in situations that warrant forceful dissent. With this lopsided cost/benefit analysis, Model Rule 5.2(b) deserves deletion.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 3

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 6, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Perlman, Andrew M., The Silliest Rule of Professional Conduct: Model Rule 5.2(b) (September 3, 2009). The Professional Lawyer, Vol. 19, No. 3, p. 14, 2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1467910

Contact Information

Andrew Perlman (Contact Author)
Suffolk University Law School ( email )
120 Tremont Street
Boston, MA 02108-4977
United States
(617) 573-8777 (Phone)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,190
Downloads: 92
Download Rank: 159,818

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.594 seconds