Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1468664
 
 

Footnotes (1)



 


 



Vinculum Fidei: The Tempest and the Law of Allegiance


Elliott Visconsi


Yale Department of English & Yale Law School

January 30, 2008

Law and Literature, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 1-20, March 2008

Abstract:     
In English constitutional law, Calvin's Case (1608) laid down a new, deeply affective basis of individual allegiance; the bond between sovereign and subject was now to be understood in personal, embodied terms as a tie of obligation and love between natural men. This essay argues that Shakespeare's The Tempest is a work of hypothetical constitutional commentary designed to illustrate the fragility and awkwardness of the new norm at home and abroad; the play moreover rebukes the theoretical ambitions of James I. The late Shakespeare, in this account, is not a political quietist but a skeptical constitutional theorist offering a monitory vision of the affective costs of the new model of allegiance and obligation.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 20

Keywords: allegiance, English common law, Shakespeare, Tempest, sovereignty

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: September 10, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Visconsi, Elliott, Vinculum Fidei: The Tempest and the Law of Allegiance (January 30, 2008). Law and Literature, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 1-20, March 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1468664

Contact Information

Elliott Visconsi (Contact Author)
Yale Department of English & Yale Law School ( email )
New Haven, CT 06520
United States
HOME PAGE: http://visconsi.org
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 608
Downloads: 90
Download Rank: 174,736
Footnotes:  1

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.328 seconds