Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1469729
 


 



Justifying Departures from Equal Treatment


Jeffrie G. Murphy


Arizona State University College of Law

March 1, 1984

The Journal of.Philosophy, Vol. 81, p. 587, 1984

Abstract:     
This article considers the fundamental axiom that we should treat like cases alike. While many theories justify this assertion, this article considers when, and more importantly why, a society would be justified in not treating like cases alike. It notes that under current Supreme Court doctrine, alleged violations of this equal protection principle are reviewed under rational basis test with minimal scrutiny applied to lower court decisions. Yet, some cases, when a fundamental right is allegedly denied, invoke the strict scrutiny standard. In those cases, government action is only permitted if there is a compelling state interest. This article lays the groundwork for discussing what could be a compelling state interest.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 7

Keywords: Constitutional Law, Compelling State Interest, Treat Like Case Alike

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 9, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Murphy, Jeffrie G., Justifying Departures from Equal Treatment (March 1, 1984). The Journal of.Philosophy, Vol. 81, p. 587, 1984. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1469729

Contact Information

Jeffrie G. Murphy (Contact Author)
Arizona State University College of Law ( email )
Box 877906
Tempe, AZ 85287-7906
United States
(480) 965-5856 (Phone)
(480) 965-2427 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 231
Downloads: 16

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.296 seconds