Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1469749
 
 

Footnotes (230)



 


 



Foreclosure, Subprime Mortgage Lending, and the Mortgage Electronic Registration System


Christopher Lewis Peterson


University of Utah - S.J. Quinney College of Law

October 5, 2009

University of Cincinnati Law Review, Vol. 78, No. 4, 2010

Abstract:     
At the roots of the worst recession since the Great Depression were unaffordable home mortgages packaged into securities, sold to investors, and used as capital assets by financial institutions. The process of securitization, as well as financial institution over-leveraging associated with it, has been well documented and explored. However, there is one company that was a party to more questionable loans and foreclosures than any other and yet has received virtually no attention in the academic literature. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., commonly referred to as “MERS,” is the recorded owner of over half of the nation’s residential mortgages. MERS operates a computer database designed to track servicing and ownership rights of mortgage loans anywhere in the United States. But, it also acts as a proxy for the real parties in interest in county land title records. Most importantly, MERS is also filing foreclosure lawsuits on behalf of financiers against hundreds of thousands of American families. This Article explores the legal and public policy foundations of this odd, but extremely powerful, company that is so attached to America’s financial destiny. It begins with a brief explanation of the origins of the county real property recording systems and the law governing real property liens. Then, it explains how MERS works, why mortgage bankers created the company, and what MERS has done to transform the underlying assumptions of state real property recording law. Next, it explores controversial doctrinal issues confronting MERS and the companies that have relied on it, including (1) whether MERS actually has standing to bring foreclosure actions; (2) whether MERS should be considered a debt collector under the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act; and (3) whether loans recorded in MERS’ name should have priority in various collateral competitions under state law and the federal bankruptcy code. The article culminates in a discussion of MERS’ culpability in fostering the mortgage foreclosure crisis and what the long term effects of privatized land title records will have on our public information infrastructure. The Article concludes by considers whether the mortgage banking industry, in creating and embracing MERS, has subverted the democratic governance of the nation’s real property recording system.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 51

Keywords: Mortgage, Electronic Registration, Recording, Priority, MERS, Predatory Lending, Foreclosure, debt collection, Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, standing

JEL Classification: K11, D18, G21

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: September 9, 2009 ; Last revised: February 1, 2014

Suggested Citation

Peterson, Christopher Lewis, Foreclosure, Subprime Mortgage Lending, and the Mortgage Electronic Registration System (October 5, 2009). University of Cincinnati Law Review, Vol. 78, No. 4, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1469749

Contact Information

Christopher Lewis Peterson (Contact Author)
University of Utah - S.J. Quinney College of Law ( email )
332 S. 1400 East Front
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
United States
801-581-6655 (Phone)
801581-6897 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.utah.edu

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 21,092
Downloads: 5,394
Download Rank: 619
Footnotes:  230

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.406 seconds