When Human Experimentation is Criminal
L. Song Richardson
University of Iowa - College of Law
September 8, 2009
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Vol. 99, No. 1, 2009
Medical researchers engaged in human experimentation commit criminal acts seemingly without consequence. Whereas other actors who violate bodily integrity and autonomy are routinely penalized with convictions for assault, fraud, and homicide, researchers escape criminal punishment. This Article begins to scrutinize this undercriminalization phenomenon and provides a framework for understanding why researchers are not prosecuted for their crimes. It argues that their exalted social status, combined with the perceived social benefit of their research, immunizes them from use of the criminal sanction. Whether these constitute sufficient grounds to give researchers a pass from punishment is a significant question because the state's failure to act creates expressive harms. It displays attitudes towards victims and perpetrators that negatively affect the values of autonomy and dignity in medical research Moreover, alternative sanctions not only lack the same expressive impact, but may also inadequately police criminal harm. This Article concludes that this implicit immunity is harmful to society and inconsistent with criminal law policy.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 45
Keywords: Criminal law, retribution, clinical trials, human subject research, punishment, civil liability, moral educationAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: September 8, 2009
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 1.609 seconds