|
||||
|
||||
The Coroner's Inquest: Ecuador's Default and Sovereign Bond DocumentationG. Mitu GulatiDuke University - School of Law Lee C. BuchheitCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP - New York Office August 11, 2009 International Financial Law Review, 2009 Abstract: Conventional wisdom is that sovereigns will rarely, if ever, default on their external debts in circumstances where it is clear that they have the capacity to pay. The first line of defense against the errant sovereign is its concern about reputation. It may have to tap the external debt markets again in the future; and there is the fear that the markets will extract revenge. But reputational constraints do not always work because some governments heavily discount future costs in favor of current benefits. When reputational constraints fail, however, a second line of defense is supposed to come into play. That line of defense is comprised of contractual and legal remedies. Both lines of defense broke down in the case of Ecuador’s default in late 2008. The breakdown of the second line of defense is significant because this was the first time that the modern theory of supermajority creditor control of sovereign debt problems was tested in practice. This Article begins the coroner’s inquest into the reasons for this breakdown and how similar situations might be averted in the future.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 12 Keywords: sovereign debt, Ecuador, sovereign bond default, international bonds Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: September 10, 2009 ; Last revised: September 16, 2009Suggested Citation |
|
||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.515 seconds