|
||||
|
||||
What Does the History of Technology Regulation Teach Us About Nano Oversight?Gary E. Marchant, JD, PhDArizona State University - College of Law Kenneth W. AbbottArizona State University Douglas J. SylvesterArizona State University - College of Law August 4, 2009 Journal of Law, Medicine, and Ethics, 2009 Abstract: As policymakers struggle to develop regulatory oversight models for nanotechnologies, there are important lessons that can be drawn from previous attempts to govern other emerging technologies. Five such lessons are: (1) public confidence and trust in a technology and its regulatory oversight is probably the most important factor for the commercial success of a technology; (2) regulation should avoid discriminating against particular technologies unless there is a scientifically-based rationale for the disparate treatment; (3) regulatory systems need to be flexible and adaptive to rapidly changing technologies; (4) ethical and social concerns of the public about emerging technologies need to be expressly acknowledged and addressed in regulatory oversight; and (5) international harmonization of regulation may be beneficial in a rapidly globalizing world.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 25 Keywords: nanotechnology, regulation, international law, technology, international relations, soft law, biotechnology, genetics Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: September 10, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.468 seconds