Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1471398
 
 

Footnotes (359)



 


 



The Torture Lawyers


Jens David Ohlin


Cornell University - School of Law

September 10, 2009

Harvard International Law Journal, Vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 193-256, 2010

Abstract:     
One of the longest shadows cast by the Bush Administration’s War on Terror involves the fate of the torture lawyers who authored or signed memoranda regarding the use of torture or enhanced interrogation techniques against detainees. Should they face professional sanction or even prosecution for their involvement? The following article suggests that their fate implicates some of the deepest questions of criminal law theory and that resolution of the debate requires a fundamental reorientation of the most important areas of justifications and excuses. First, the debate about torture has been overly focused on justifications for torture. This can be explained in part by a general confusion in U.S. law over the necessity defense. Second, this Article therefore argues that necessity, when properly understood, constitutes two separate defenses, one a justification and the other an excuse, each with its own standard. The necessity justification does not apply to government agents who tortured detainees, though necessity as an excuse might apply under certain conditions. However, excused necessity - like all excuses - does not generate a corresponding exculpation for accomplices, like the torture lawyers, who might be said to have aided and abetted the principal perpetrators. Third, the Article questions the usual assumption of lawyers that they are only liable as accomplices if they supported their client’s criminality through frivolous legal arguments, though even under this standard the torture lawyers might face accomplice liability for some of their arguments. Finally, commentators are wrong that such prosecutions would be unprecedented. The United States itself prosecuted Nazi officials at Nuremberg for their failure to properly advise the Reich that their conduct violated international law.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 64

Keywords: Torture, Necessity, Complicity, Aiding and Abetting, Justifications, Excuses, Accomplice Liability, Attorney Advice

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: September 10, 2009 ; Last revised: February 20, 2010

Suggested Citation

Ohlin, Jens David, The Torture Lawyers (September 10, 2009). Harvard International Law Journal, Vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 193-256, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1471398

Contact Information

Jens David Ohlin (Contact Author)
Cornell University - School of Law ( email )
218 Myron Taylor Hall
Ithaca, NY 14853-4901
United States
(607) 255-0479 (Phone)
(607) 255-7193 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,523
Downloads: 543
Download Rank: 27,843
Footnotes:  359

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.328 seconds