Governing the Presidential Nomination Commons
Brigham Young University - J. Reuben Clark Law School
September, 10 2009
Tulane Law Review, Vol. 84, 2010
The presidential primary system is plagued by states jockeying to hold primaries and caucuses as early as possible. While the trend of racing to vote is not new, it has increased alarmingly. In 2008, more than half the states held contests by the first week of February. This free-for-all hurts the democratic process by encouraging uninformed voting, emphasizing the role of money in campaigns, and pressing candidates to rely on sound-bite campaigning. Because the presidential nomination is one of the most important decisions left to voters in the United States, this problem is well-recognized. It is also widely misunderstood. This article casts the problem in a different light, demonstrating that frontloading of the nomination process is a classic tragedy of the commons. Recognizing the problem as a commons dilemma provides a powerful explanation for the trend toward earlier primaries and, more importantly, provides insights into how best to reform the nomination system.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 46
Keywords: Frontloading, presidential primary, commons, common-pool resources, tragedy of the commonsAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: September 10, 2009
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 1.234 seconds