Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1471550
 
 

Citations (1)



 


 



Presidential Power over International Law: Restoring the Balance


Oona A. Hathaway


Yale University - Law School

February 22, 2012

Yale Law Journal, Vol. 119, No. 2, p, 140, 2009
Yale Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 199

Abstract:     
The vast majority of U.S. international agreements today are made by the President acting alone on behalf of the United States. Little noticed and rarely discussed, the agreements are negotiated and concluded in a process almost completely hidden from outside view. No single actor is responsible for this state of affairs. It is instead the result of a deep, long-term, and largely hidden transformation. Over the course of more than a century, Congress gradually yielded power to the President to make international agreements. Each individual delegation of authority relinquished only a small measure of power, while freeing members of Congress to focus on matters that were more likely to improve their reelection prospects. But the cumulative effect over time left Congress with little power over international lawmaking.

This imbalance of power over international lawmaking is inconsistent with basic principles of democratic governance. The President should be the leading actor in creating binding international legal commitments for the United States - but not the only actor. The current lawmaking process does not provide for genuine cooperation among the branches of government. Instead, a single branch of government is able to make law over an immense array of issues - including issues with significant domestic ramifications - by concluding binding international agreements. This imbalance of power not only violates democratic principles, but may even lead to less favorable and less effective international agreements.

To correct this imbalance, this Article proposes a comprehensive reform statute that would normalize U.S. international lawmaking by reorganizing it around two separate tracks. International agreements that are now made by the President alone would proceed on an administrative track and would be subject to what might be called an “Administrative Procedure Act for International Law.” This new process would offer greater openness, public participation, and transparency, but not overburden lawmaking. A legislative track would include two existing methods for concluding international agreements: Senate-approved Article II treaties and congressional-executive agreements expressly approved by both houses of Congress. In addition, it would include an expanded “fast track” process that would permit streamlined congressional approval of agreements. Together, these proposals promise to create a more balanced, more democratic, and more effective system for international lawmaking in the United States.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 129

Keywords: international law, congressional executive agreement, president, article II, democracy

JEL Classification: K33, K00

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: September 11, 2009 ; Last revised: February 22, 2012

Suggested Citation

Hathaway, Oona A., Presidential Power over International Law: Restoring the Balance (February 22, 2012). Yale Law Journal, Vol. 119, No. 2, p, 140, 2009; Yale Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 199. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1471550

Contact Information

Oona A. Hathaway (Contact Author)
Yale University - Law School ( email )
P.O. Box 208215
New Haven, CT 06520-8215
United States
203-432-4992 (Phone)
203-432-1107 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,856
Downloads: 385
Download Rank: 44,061
Citations:  1

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.312 seconds