Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1471567
 
 

Footnotes (104)



 


 



Guilty by Implicit Racial Bias: The Guilty/Not Guilty Implicit Association Test


Justin D. Levinson


University of Hawaii at Manoa - William S. Richardson School of Law

Huajian Cai


affiliation not provided to SSRN

Danielle Young


University of Hawaii at Manoa - Department of Psychology

September 10, 2009

Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, Forthcoming

Abstract:     
For many legal scholars, startling scientific evidence of implicit racial bias, including the now famous Implicit Association Test (IAT), have revealed a truth about racial discrimination in America that had previously been difficult to prove. Yet despite commentators’ progress in considering how the law should respond to this new evidence of racial bias, two challenges have continued to limit legal scholarship on implicit bias from achieving its full potential. First, empirical social science on implicit bias has rarely focused on the law. For example, prior to the study presented in this article, no IATs had been designed specifically to test law-related hypotheses. And second, legal scholarship on implicit bias has tended to maintain a narrow substantive focus, often considering discrimination in the workplace and in policy-making, but rarely considering racial biases in other areas of law. The question, for example, of whether jury verdicts in criminal trials are tainted by implicit racial biases has yet to be considered adequately.

This Article considers the growth potential for legal scholarship on implicit bias, and presents a new law-related IAT that the authors devised - the Guilty/Not Guilty IAT. The authors designed this study both to address the challenges legal scholarship on implicit bias has faced, and to create a test that would investigate the racial disparities that continue to plague the American criminal justice system. The study used well established IAT methodology to test whether people harbor implicit associations between African American men and criminal law guilty verdicts. The Guilty/Not Guilty IAT asked study participants to group together photos of Black and White men with words representing the verdicts Guilty and Not Guilty, and measured their reaction times in milliseconds. The results of the study are concerning: study participants held strong implicit associations between Black men and guilty verdicts (as measured by well accepted IAT calculation methods). In addition, these results proved to be quite meaningful in predicting decision-making. Scores on the Guilty/Not Guilty IAT predicted how participants evaluated evidence. The authors consider the study results in light of the presumed racial fairness underlying the presumption of innocence, and call for a broader, empirically based exploration of implicit racial bias in the legal system.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 21

Keywords: implicit racial bias, racial disparities, implicit association test, implicit social cognition, racial justice

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: September 22, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Levinson, Justin D. and Cai, Huajian and Young, Danielle, Guilty by Implicit Racial Bias: The Guilty/Not Guilty Implicit Association Test (September 10, 2009). Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1471567

Contact Information

Justin D. Levinson (Contact Author)
University of Hawaii at Manoa - William S. Richardson School of Law ( email )
2515 Dole Street
Honolulu, HI 96822
United States
Huajian Cai
affiliation not provided to SSRN
Danielle Young
University of Hawaii at Manoa - Department of Psychology ( email )
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,338
Downloads: 413
Download Rank: 40,355
Footnotes:  104
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.265 seconds