Match That!: An Empirical Assessment of Rights of First Refusal in Merger Agreements

Brian JM Quinn

BC Law School

December 27, 2008

This short paper provides an overview of rights of first refusal (match rights) in merger agreements. Match rights are common in merger agreements, nearly universal. Even though these preemptive rights can be a strong economic deterrent to topping bids, there is little, if any, Delaware case law limiting their use. In fact, one recent chancery court decision endorsed the use of rights of first refusal in order to end an auction where Revlon duties applied. With the Toys r Us case as a backdrop, this paper will attempt to evaluate the competitive effects of rights of first refusal, specifically their impact on the deal premia, number of bidders and the prevalence of “deal jumping.” If the data provide evidence that rights of first refusal are anti-competitive, this paper will make arguments in favor of adopting a rule to limit reliance on match rights when Revlon duties apply.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 16

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: September 16, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Quinn, Brian JM, Match That!: An Empirical Assessment of Rights of First Refusal in Merger Agreements (December 27, 2008). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1473080 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1473080

Contact Information

Brian JM Quinn (Contact Author)
BC Law School ( email )
885 Centre Street
Newton, MA 02459-1163
United States

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,175
Downloads: 281
Download Rank: 80,371

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.172 seconds