Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1473190
 
 

Footnotes (143)



 


 



Beyond Borders: Disassembling the State-Based Model of Federal Forum Fairness


Jamelle Sharpe


University of Illinois College of Law

August 29, 2009

Cardozo Law Review, Vol. 30, 2009
Illinois Public Law Research Paper No. 09-06

Abstract:     
Protecting defendants from being forced to litigate in unfair (i.e., unduly burdensome or inconvenient) forums has long been a limiting principle in the exercise of federal judicial power. Rules governing federal service of process and venue play a critical role in providing this protection, as they are the initial means by which plaintiffs select the place of trial. Surprisingly, the courts and the academy have expended comparatively little analytical energy to analyze how well these rules protect defendants from litigating in unfair locations. Utilizing first principles of rule precision and information analysis not previously applied in this context, this Article asserts that the rules governing federal service of process and venue largely fail in this task. By focusing on the connections between the defendant and the state in which the federal district court sits, venue and service of process rules call for limited information that ultimately provides a poor proxy for federal forum fairness. The crudeness of this proxy could more easily be excused if it provided a substantial benefit in the form of administrative simplicity. Unfortunately, the current regime is nothing if not baroque, consisting of a maze of rules, tests, and standards that elicit information which is, ultimately, a highly imprecise approximation of a defendant’s ability to litigate in a particular location. Though perfection is impossible, we can certainly do better. Accordingly, courts and scholars should end their attempts to refine the current tests in the hopes of better scrutinizing suboptimal information. Instead, this Article proposes both a reevaluation of the information used to determine forum fairness, and a reassessment of whether courts or litigants are in the best position to optimally use this information.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 51

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: September 14, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Sharpe, Jamelle, Beyond Borders: Disassembling the State-Based Model of Federal Forum Fairness (August 29, 2009). Cardozo Law Review, Vol. 30, 2009; Illinois Public Law Research Paper No. 09-06. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1473190

Contact Information

Jamelle Sharpe (Contact Author)
University of Illinois College of Law ( email )
504 E. Pennsylvania Avenue
Champaign, IL 61820
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 341
Downloads: 54
Download Rank: 227,654
Footnotes:  143

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.344 seconds