Falling on Deaf Ears: Is the 'Fail-Safe' Triennial Exemption Provision in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act Effective in Protecting Fair Use?
Samford University - Cumberland School of Law; Stanford Law School Center for Internet and Society
Journal of Intellectual Property Law, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2005
This Article examines whether the "fail-safe" triennial exemption provision of the DMCA is effective for its intended purpose: to serve as a countermeasure to the DMCA's anticircumvention provisions by protecting the ability of the public to engage in noninfringing uses of copyrighted works.
Ultimately, this Article concludes that there are too many faults in both the structure and the execution of the rulemaking provision to meaningfully counteract the adverse effects of the anticircumvention provisions of the DMCA. Specifically, the rulemaking procedure explicitly prohibits exemptions to a class based on the use of the work. This amounts to a rejection of fair use principles - one of the very doctrines the exemption provision was designed to protect.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 42
Keywords: copyright, drm, dmca, fair use, anticircumvention, triennial rulemakingAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: September 21, 2009 ; Last revised: March 22, 2010
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.437 seconds