Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1473995
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (381)



 


 



The Puzzling Persistence of the Single Entity Argument for Sports Leagues: American Needle and the Supreme Court's Opportunity to Reject a Flawed Defense


Gabe Feldman


Tulane School of Law

September 15, 2009

Wisconsin Law Review, Forthcoming
Tulane Public Law Research Paper No. 1473995

Abstract:     
Later this term, the Supreme Court will hear American Needle v. National Football League, a case that might fundamentally change professional sports and rewrite sports antitrust law. In American Needle, the Seventh Circuit held that the National Football League (NFL) acts as a single entity when licensing its intellectual property and thus is immune from scrutiny under Section 1of the Sherman Act. Although the Seventh Circuit is the first circuit court to hold that a sports league is a single entity, the argument that leagues act as single entities has persisted for decades. Leagues view the single entity defense as the antitrust “holy grail,” because it shields them from Section 1 attack and costly antitrust litigation. Section 1 explicitly requires an agreement, and an agreement requires more than one entity. Thus, as a matter of law, a single entity cannot violate Section 1.

This Article argues that a single entity classification for sports leagues divorces antitrust immunity from the fundamental purpose of the antitrust laws and is theoretically unsupportable. Antitrust law is designed to act as a gatekeeper, filtering out net anticompetitive conduct. The Seventh Circuit’s single entity approach ignores the competitive effects of league conduct and distorts the basic rationale for distinguishing between single and multiple entity conduct. In doing so, it vests sports leagues with virtually free rein to engage in anticompetitive behavior. This Article also brings to light evidence of actual economic competition between NFL teams that proves that the Seventh Circuit’s single entity analysis in American Needle is factually unsupportable. This Article thus concludes that the Supreme Court should definitively put an end to the single entity defense for professional sports leagues. The Article also proposes a model for streamlining the rule of reason analysis and reducing the litigation burden on sports leagues.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 75

Keywords: American Needle, Antitrust, Sherman Act, National Football League, Single entity, restraint of trade, professonal sports leagues

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: September 15, 2009 ; Last revised: February 4, 2010

Suggested Citation

Feldman, Gabe, The Puzzling Persistence of the Single Entity Argument for Sports Leagues: American Needle and the Supreme Court's Opportunity to Reject a Flawed Defense (September 15, 2009). Wisconsin Law Review, Forthcoming; Tulane Public Law Research Paper No. 1473995. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1473995

Contact Information

Gabe Feldman (Contact Author)
Tulane School of Law ( email )
6329 Freret Street
New Orleans, LA 70118
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,069
Downloads: 561
Download Rank: 27,130
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  381

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.406 seconds