|
||||
|
||||
An SMLLC Paradox: Disregarded for Federal Tax Purposes But Not in Federal Court
Carter G. Bishop Suffolk University Law School Professor Daniel S. Kleinberger William Mitchell College of Law Journal of Business Entities, Forthcoming Suffolk University Law School Research Paper No. 09-42 William Mitchell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 121 Abstract: In Federal Court, the only member of a SMLLC may not represent the SMLLC unless that owner is also a lawyer. To do so exposes the SMLLC to dismissal as well as the owner to the unauthorized practice of law. The article explores the implications of these rules to small closely held LLCs. Accepted Paper Series Date posted: September 17, 2009 ; Last revised: November 11, 2009Suggested Citation |
|
||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was served by apollo6 in 0.094 seconds.