Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1474926
 
 

Footnotes (2)



 


 



Physicians’ Brief in the Second Circuit Data Mining Cases (IMS V. Sorrell) on Behalf of Amici Curiae New England Journal of Medicine, Vermont Medical Society, Massachusetts Medical Society, New Hampshire Medical Society, National Physicians Alliance, and American Medical Students Association


Kevin Outterson


Boston University School of Law

Christopher T. Robertson


University of Arizona - James E. Rogers College of Law; Harvard University - Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics; Harvard University - Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics

David Orentlicher


Indiana University - Robert H. McKinney School of Law

September 17, 2009

Boston Univ. School of Law Working Paper No. 09-44
Harvard Public Law Working Paper No. 09-55

Abstract:     
This is the “Physicians’ Brief” filed in the Second Circuit data mining cases (IMS v. Sorrell) on behalf of amici curiae New England Journal of Medicine, Vermont Medical Society, Massachusetts Medical Society, New Hampshire Medical Society, National Physicians Alliance, and American Medical Students Association. Data mining of prescriber-identifiable (PI) medical records offends the privacy of the physician, but also permits companies to identify particular patients against their wishes. Data mining assists drug companies in illegal off-label promotion by identifying both high and low prescribers for promotional attention. Data mining has also supported the promotion of dangerous drugs. In addition to the privacy concerns, these practices are dangerous and raise health care costs. The Vermont Prescription Privacy Law is part of a larger statutory framework of state and federal laws protecting medical privacy. Federal law has carved out a special role for state medical privacy laws, protecting them from federal preemption. Furthermore, the First Amendment does not protect speech when the underlying data was obtained illegally. Vermont satisfies the Central Hudson test and the Prescription Privacy Law should be upheld. The First Amendment does not require this Court to overturn the legislative determination by the elected government of Vermont, especially when the State has extensive experience as a health care payor and is well versed in cost control options. Moreover, the Prescription Privacy Law does not ban data mining, but leaves this important decision in the hands of the person best able to decide whether it helps the patient or not – the prescribing physician.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 43

Keywords: public law, constitutional law, first amendment, health law, electronic health records, privacy, data mining, pharmaceuticals, marketing

JEL Classification: K19, K23, K29, K32

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: September 19, 2009 ; Last revised: February 28, 2014

Suggested Citation

Outterson, Kevin and Robertson, Christopher T. and Orentlicher, David, Physicians’ Brief in the Second Circuit Data Mining Cases (IMS V. Sorrell) on Behalf of Amici Curiae New England Journal of Medicine, Vermont Medical Society, Massachusetts Medical Society, New Hampshire Medical Society, National Physicians Alliance, and American Medical Students Association (September 17, 2009). Boston Univ. School of Law Working Paper No. 09-44; Harvard Public Law Working Paper No. 09-55. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1474926 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1474926

Contact Information

Kevin Outterson (Contact Author)
Boston University School of Law ( email )
765 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
United States
Christopher T. Robertson
University of Arizona - James E. Rogers College of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 210176
Tucson, AZ 85721-0176
United States
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.arizona.edu/faculty/getprofile.cfm?facultyid=714

Harvard University - Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics ( email )
124 Mount Auburn Street
Suite 520N
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

Harvard University - Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics ( email )
23 Everett Street
Cambridge, MA 02155
United States
David Orentlicher
Indiana University - Robert H. McKinney School of Law ( email )
530 West New York Street
Indianapolis, IN 46202
United States
317-274-4993 (Phone)
317-274-0455 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,031
Downloads: 157
Download Rank: 111,801
Footnotes:  2

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.469 seconds