Monopoly Broth Makes Bad Soup
Daniel A. Crane
University of Michigan Law School
September 17, 2009
Antitrust Law Journal, Forthcoming
University of Michigan Public Law Working Paper No. 163
U of Michigan Law & Economics, Olin Working Paper No. 09-020
There is an oft-repeated maxim that a monopolist’s conduct must be examined in its totality since it is “the mix of various ingredients... in a monopoly broth that produces the unsavory flavor.” This maxim is subject to use and abuse. In this symposium essay, I propose three principles for a correct normative understanding of the “monopoly broth” maxim. First, independently lawful conduct - such as above-cost pricing, refusals to deal, or functionality-enhancing product innovations - should never be added to a “broth” to create liability. Second, where the legality of certain conduct - particularly exclusive dealing, tying, and similar conduct - turns on the degree of market foreclosure, aggregating the defendant’s various exclusive-dealing-like practices is necessary to determine legality. Finally, where the defendant commits independently unlawful acts “such as torts, crimes, breaches of contract, or regulatory violations” that purportedly serve to monopolize the market, the conduct should only be combined in a “broth” for litigation purposes if the plaintiff offers a robust explanation of the synergistic effects of the disparate forms of bad behavior.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 14
Keywords: monopoly broth
JEL Classification: K21Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: September 19, 2009 ; Last revised: October 8, 2009
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.859 seconds