Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1475313
 
 

Footnotes (293)



 


 



Beyond Victims of Sexual Perverts: Expanding Shielding to All Juvenile Witnesses


Andrea Dennis


University of Georgia Law School

September 18, 2009


Abstract:     
In Maryland v. Craig, the Supreme Court approved shielding child abuse victim-witnesses from the presence of the defendant while the witnesses testified. The genesis for shielding laws was social science evidence demonstrating trauma to child sex abuse victims who, while testifying, confronted defendants. Because the Supreme Court to date has declined to consider the scope of applicability of Craig, the current legal landscape of shielding rules suffers from a lack of uniformity on the breadth of applicability of shielding. Consequently, if a juvenile witness does not fall within the class of witnesses protected by a shielding statute, then the witness may be forced to testify in the defendant’s presence and without being shielded. Such an event may traumatize the child, just as it might a child sexual abuse victim-witness. This Article contends that Craig should be interpreted to extend to all juvenile witnesses regardless of age, nature of the case, or relationship of the child to the case as victim or witness. The Court’s rationale in Craig is sufficiently broad to warrant extension of shielding to all juveniles in any case, yet narrow enough to avoid eviscerating the right of confrontation. To implement the changes argued for herein, the Article recommends that legislatures adopt the Uniform Child Witness Testimony by Alternative Methods Act with one essential change: revise the Act’s age limit from thirteen years of age to eighteen years of age.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 64

Keywords: Juveniles, Confrontation Right, Shielding

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 18, 2009 ; Last revised: March 27, 2011

Suggested Citation

Dennis, Andrea, Beyond Victims of Sexual Perverts: Expanding Shielding to All Juvenile Witnesses (September 18, 2009). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1475313 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1475313

Contact Information

Andrea Dennis (Contact Author)
University of Georgia Law School ( email )
Athens, GA 30602
United States
706-542-3130 (Phone)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 288
Downloads: 34
Footnotes:  293

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.281 seconds