Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (227)



 


 



Balancing Law Student Privacy Interests and Progressive Pedagogy: Dispelling the Myth that FERPA Prohibits Cutting-Edge Academic Support Methodologies


Louis N. Schulze Jr.


New England Law | Boston

September 18, 2009

Widener Law Journal, Vol. 19, p. 215, 2009

Abstract:     
Controversy exists over whether the Family Education Records Privacy Act prohibits certain progressive law school academic support methodologies. This Article analyzes these claims, using the text of the statute, the related regulations, case law from the Supreme Court of the United States and other federal courts, and statements from the Department of Education. The thesis of this Article is that most academic support methods are perfectly lawful and that FERPA and progressive pedagogy can peaceably coexist.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 57

Keywords: FERPA, legal education, civil rights, academic support

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 28, 2009 ; Last revised: December 13, 2012

Suggested Citation

Schulze, Louis N. , Balancing Law Student Privacy Interests and Progressive Pedagogy: Dispelling the Myth that FERPA Prohibits Cutting-Edge Academic Support Methodologies (September 18, 2009). Widener Law Journal, Vol. 19, p. 215, 2009 . Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1475361

Contact Information

Louis Schulze Jr. (Contact Author)
New England Law | Boston ( email )
154 Stuart St.
Boston, MA 02116
United States

Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 643
Downloads: 154
Download Rank: 95,720
Footnotes:  227

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo8 in 1.547 seconds