Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1475687
 
 

Footnotes (180)



 


 



Reconciling Equal Protection and Federal Indian Law


Bethany Berger


University of Connecticut School of Law

September 19, 2009

California Law Review, Vol. 98, p. 1165, 2010

Abstract:     
In this essay for a festschrift in celebration of Philip Frickey and his work, I show how equal protection and federal Indian law can be reconciled without succumbing to what Professor Frickey has called the seduction of artificial coherence. Federal Indian policies increasingly face arguments that, in providing special treatment for individuals and groups defined in part by descent from indigenous tribes, they violate the requirement of equal protection before the law. I argue that such arguments ignore the congruence of federal Indian policy and equal protection as a matter of constitutional norms, constitutional history, and constitutional text. Federal Indian policies at their best undo the results of defining indigenous peoples as inferior racial groups rather than sovereigns entitled to political and property rights. This consistency between civil rights and protection of tribal rights was recognized by the framers of the fourteenth amendment, and is reflected in both judicial decisions and historical developments in federal Indian policy. American constitutional principles, in other words, support both equal protection and tribal rights, and militate against any false consistency that would undermine the principles of equality and respect on which both are based.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 34

Keywords: Federal Indian Law, Equal Protection, Constitutional Law, Civil Rights, Race

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 20, 2009 ; Last revised: October 23, 2010

Suggested Citation

Berger, Bethany, Reconciling Equal Protection and Federal Indian Law (September 19, 2009). California Law Review, Vol. 98, p. 1165, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1475687

Contact Information

Bethany Berger (Contact Author)
University of Connecticut School of Law ( email )
65 Elizabeth Street
Hartford, CT 06105
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,186
Downloads: 159
Download Rank: 108,326
Footnotes:  180

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.359 seconds