Specific Knowledge and Divisional Performance Measurement
Michael C. Jensen
Harvard Business School; Social Science Electronic Publishing (SSEP), Inc.; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI)
William H. Meckling
Simon School, University of Rochester (Deceased)
September 19, 2009
Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Vol. 21, Issue 2, pp. 49-57, Spring 2009
Harvard Business School Negotiation, Organizations & Markets Unit Working Paper 10-025
Simon School Working Paper No. FR 09-14
This paper discusses five common divisional performance measurement methods - cost centers, revenue centers, profit centers, investment centers, and expense centers - while providing a theory that explains when each of these methods is likely to be the most efficient. The central insight of the theory is that each method offers a different way of aligning decision-making authority with valuable 'specific knowledge' inside the organization.
The theory suggests that cost and revenue centers work best in cases where headquarters has good information about cost and demand functions, product quality, and optimal output mix. Profit centers - defined as business units whose managers have responsibility for overall profits, but not the authority to make major capital spending decisions - tend to supplant revenue and cost centers when line managers have a significant informational advantage over headquarters and when there are few interdependencies (or 'synergies') between divisions. Investment centers - profit centers in which unit managers are allowed to make major investment decisions - tend to prevail when the activity is capital-intensive and when it is difficult for headquarters to identify the value-maximizing investment strategy for the business unit.
In evaluating the performance of profit centers, rate-of-return measures like ROA are likely to be effective when unit managers do not have major influence over the level of new investment. But, in the case of investment centers, Economic Value Added, or EVA, is likely to be the most effective single-period measure because it is designed to encourage only value-increasing investment decisions.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 14
Keywords: Performance measurement, cost center, profit center, investment center, expense center, specific knowledge, general knowledge
JEL Classification: G31, L22, M21Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: September 19, 2009 ; Last revised: October 15, 2009
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.328 seconds