Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1476381
 
 

Footnotes (223)



 


 



Correlation Plausibility: A Framework for Fairness and Predictability in Pleading Practice After Twombly and Iqbal


Stephen R. Brown


Alumnus, Univeristy of Cincinnati - College of Law

January 4, 2010

Creighton Law Review, Vol. 44, p. 141, 2010

Abstract:     
Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly and Ashcroft v. Iqbal, the Supreme Court’s two recent and controversial decisions on pleading, require a judge to determine if a plaintiff’s claim is “plausible” at the pleading stage of litigation. Following Twombly and Iqbal, commentators have complained that the inquiry unfairly injects subjectivity into pleading, allowing a judge to screen disfavored cases before a plaintiff has an opportunity for discovery. Others have argued that the plausibility inquiry is anywhere from “foggy” to “incoherent.” In short, these two cases have placed “federal pleading standards in crisis.”

This Article makes plausibility coherent.

To begin, this Article examines plausibility from a judge’s perspective, an exercise that has not yet been explicitly undertaken. This exercise leads to new insights about plausibility and a new system for adjudicating the plausibility inquiry that focuses on correlation.

Correlation plausibility best explains what a judge is really saying when she says that a complaint is plausible and provides a concrete, tangible formulation of plausibility. No previously proposed approach can adequately explain the Supreme Court’s holdings in both Twombly and Iqbal. This new understanding of plausibility moves the inquiry away from ambiguity and subjectivity and provides a plaintiff a blueprint for moving plausibility toward objectivity, giving a plaintiff a better chance of changing the mind of a judge predisposed against her claim.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 38

Keywords: Twombly, Iqbal, 12(b), Pleading, 12(b)(6), motion to dismiss

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: September 21, 2009 ; Last revised: February 10, 2011

Suggested Citation

Brown, Stephen R., Correlation Plausibility: A Framework for Fairness and Predictability in Pleading Practice After Twombly and Iqbal (January 4, 2010). Creighton Law Review, Vol. 44, p. 141, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1476381

Contact Information

Stephen R. Brown (Contact Author)
Alumnus, Univeristy of Cincinnati - College of Law ( email )
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 452
Downloads: 49
Footnotes:  223

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.329 seconds