The Forgotten Sovereigns
Washburn University School of Law
Florida State University Law Review, Vol. 36, No. 4, 2009
Our federal system includes 562 federally-recognized American Indian nations, most of whom have their own sovereign lands, governments, and court systems, and who interact every day with the state and federal systems. Yet most legal thought overlooks our sovereign Native American nations and legal heritage. Although much of American law and policy intersects Tribal jurisdictions, such issues generally appear in the law school curriculum only in specialized, upper-level courses. This Article argues that the three-sovereign system should provide the fundamental framework for the United States legal system across the legal curriculum, and provides several concrete examples for how to do so. It also argues that many law courses should touch upon how their disciplines impact Tribal jurisdictions and their citizens.
By changing our fundamental orientation toward the role of Tribal sovereigns in the U.S. system, we will advance the academy’s goals of scholarship, teaching, and service. First, we will accurately represent the true structure and diversity of our tripartite federal system. Second, we can improve learning by using direct and comparative Tribal perspectives for fundamental legal principles and methods. Third, we can further the social justice mission by raising awareness of Tribal sovereignty among future advocates and lawmakers.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 61
Keywords: tribal, tribal law, tribal government, tribal courts, native american, sovereignty, legal writing, law curriculum, legal system, social justice, cultural literacy, critical race theory, indian law, indigenous, selecting authority, customary law, three-sovereign, tri-sovereignAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: September 21, 2009 ; Last revised: March 11, 2010
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.672 seconds