SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (117)

Beta

 


 



Using Constitutional Adjudication to Remedy Socio-Economic Injustice: Comparative Lessons from South Africa

Eric C. Christiansen
Golden Gate University School of Law


September 23, 2009


Abstract:     
Does inclusion of social welfare rights in the text of a constitution assist a country in addressing the challenge of poverty? Can judicial enforcement of rights to housing, healthcare, education and other welfare necessities advance substantive socio-economic equality in the manner traditional rights adjudication has advanced the related goal of civil and political equality? The purpose of this Article is to evaluate whether constitutional protection and court adjudication of social welfare rights are viable tools to address social injustice and to remedy persistent economic inequality.

The frequency of inclusion of socio-economic rights in modern constitutions is evidence of the increasing popularity of pre-committing to social welfare. Nevertheless, few countries' courts have enforced such rights and only the Republic of South Africa has crafted a comprehensive, affirmative approach to enumerated social welfare rights. There is a revolutionary-and instructive-element to the Court's work in this area. Through the process of "differentiated incorporation," the South African Court has crafted a viable jurisprudence for itself and identified an exportable model for social rights adjudication: A country-specific approach that disregards concerns invalid in the importing country but accommodates valid justiciability concerns through domestically-appropriate processes.

But even if adoption is possible for other countries with enumerated social rights, is it productive of improved social welfare? This Article uses the specific South African experience to evaluate the general capacity of constitutionally-enforced social welfare rights to advance socio-economic equality. It concludes that when one tempers expectations in light of the appropriate role for a judiciary and forgives some of the excessive caution by the South African pioneers in this area of jurisprudence, courts and constitutions have contributed-and may increasingly contribute-to the advancement of social justice in South Africa and elsewhere.

Keywords: South Africa, social welfare rights, Constitutional Court, poverty, socio-economic rights, social justice, rights adjudication

Working Paper Series

Date posted: September 24, 2009 ; Last revised: September 24, 2009

Suggested Citation

Christiansen, Eric C. , Using Constitutional Adjudication to Remedy Socio-Economic Injustice: Comparative Lessons from South Africa (September 23, 2009). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1477478


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Eric C. Christiansen (Contact Author)
Golden Gate University School of Law ( email )
San Francisco, CA 94105
United States
(415)369-5338 (Phone)
(415)442-6609 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 170
Downloads: 51
Download Rank: 126,623
Footnotes: 117

© 2010 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was served by apolloc 6 in 0.281 seconds.