Strategic Statutory Interpretation by Administrative Agencies
Harvard University - Department of Economics; Hebrew University of Jerusalem - Faculty of Law; Harvard University - Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics
September 25, 2009
American Law and Economics Review, Forthcoming
Many statutes are administered by administrative agencies. This paper shows that, when interpreting an ambiguous statute, administrative agencies choose between two strategies of statutory interpretation: the risky strategy - a relatively aggressive interpretation that provokes an appeal by the firm - and the safe strategy - a relatively non-aggressive interpretation that the firm complies with. The paper also shows that a change in the level of judicial deference may result in a shift from the risky strategy to the safe one, or vice versa. Therefore, contrary to the commonly held view, an increase in the level of judicial deference may result in agencies choosing a less aggressive statutory interpretation, and in more court decisions reversing agencies' statutory interpretation.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 20
Keywords: Administrative Agencies, Statutory Interpretation, Law Enforcement
JEL Classification: D02, D73, D78, K23Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: July 19, 2011
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.640 seconds