|
||||
|
||||
Regulating Philanthropy in the 21st Century: An Institutional Choice Analysis
Lloyd H. Mayer Notre Dame Law School Brendan M. Wilson Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, L.L.P. Chicago-Kent Law Review, Forthcoming Notre Dame Legal Studies Paper No. 09-41 Abstract: For more than fifty years scholars, practitioners, and government officials have debated whether the federal government, the state governments, or the charitable sector itself can best ensure that charitable organization leaders fulfill their fiduciary duties. The dramatic growth of this sector, recent highly publicized governance scandals, and a push in Congress and the IRS for more federal involvement in this area have now brought this issue to a head. This article lays a foundation for resolving the dispute by developing an institutional choice framework for considering and comparing the various available options. Applying that framework, the article concludes that the best regulators of charity governance would most likely be state-level government agencies that work with but have a limited degree of independent from the state attorneys general. The article also determines that the best way to ensure adoption of this institutional choice – and limit potential weaknesses – is for the federal government to use a portion of the already existing private foundation investment income tax to provide funding for such agencies.
Keywords: nonprofit corporation, governance, fiduciary duties, institutional choice, institutional design, tax-exempt organization, IRS Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: October 05, 2009 ; Last revised: October 05, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was served by apollo6 in 0.094 seconds.