Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1481891
 
 

Footnotes (318)



 


 



Conquering Peace: Military Commissions as a Lawfare Strategy in the Mexican War


Erika Myers


affiliation not provided to SSRN

Spring 2008

American Journal of Criminal Law, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 201-240, 2008

Abstract:     
The War on Terror has provoked much discussion on the proper role of law in war. A considerable amount of this debate has centered on the idea of lawfare: the use of international law as a weapon of war - usually by weaker states or unconventional combatants, and usually to America’s disadvantage. This Note examines this theory of lawfare through our experience with military tribunals in the Mexican War; it provides the most extensive study to date of the use of military commissions and councils of war during that conflict. Other articles have surveyed the history of American military tribunals from the Revolutionary period to the present, primarily focusing on the balance of power between the legislative and executive branches over military tribunals in the absence of specific legislation. Few, however, have devoted any significant attention to the Mexican War, and none have thoroughly explored how the Mexican War tribunals functioned as part of the American occupation strategy. This Note argues that General Scott used military tribunals as part of a counterinsurgency strategy, developing innovations tailored to the needs of his occupation yet exceeding the requirements of international law, and that this strategy worked to hamper public support for and decrease the effectiveness of unconventional enemy combatants. This Note is also the first to relate this history to the idea of lawfare, using it to challenge the common perception that lawfare is a strategy of America’s enemies, by showing how Scott used lawfare to American advantage in the occupation of Mexico.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 40

Keywords: lawfare, military commission, council of war, court martial, military tribunal, Mexican War, UCMJ, military justice, guerrilla, counterinsurgency, judge advocate, international law, Guantanamo, War on Terror, Lieber Code, Geneva Conventions, enemy combatant, occupation, Winfield Scott

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: October 5, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Myers, Erika, Conquering Peace: Military Commissions as a Lawfare Strategy in the Mexican War (Spring 2008). American Journal of Criminal Law, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 201-240, 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1481891

Contact Information

Erika Myers (Contact Author)
affiliation not provided to SSRN
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 523
Downloads: 106
Download Rank: 156,249
Footnotes:  318

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.406 seconds