|
||||
|
||||
Cost and Fee Allocation in Civil Procedure: United States of America National Report
James R. Maxeiner University of Baltimore School of Law American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 58, No. Supplemental, 2010 International Academy of Comparative Law, 18th World Congress, Washington D.C., July 21-31, 2010 Abstract: This report summarizes critically the American practice of providing indemnity for court costs in litigation but not for attorneys' fees. It considers the basics, who pays, the rationals, exceptions,and modifications. It challenges the suggestion that the American no-indemnity practice reflects American values and debunks the assertion that it is used to promote access to justice. The report show that American jurists, just as their non-American counterparts, have pointed to a rational of full realization of rights to support complete indemnity. The reports notes the role of the bar in promoting no indemnity and the importance of viewing litigation as an event separate from the rights that it is to enforce.
Keywords: American rule, English rule, contingent fee, fee-shifting, costs, attorney's fees, legal aid, access to justice Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: October 07, 2009 ; Last revised: October 07, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was served by apollo 6 in 0.094 seconds.