SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

Cost and Fee Allocation in Civil Procedure: United States of America National Report

James R. Maxeiner
University of Baltimore School of Law



American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 58, No. Supplemental, 2010
International Academy of Comparative Law, 18th World Congress, Washington D.C., July 21-31, 2010

Abstract:     
This report summarizes critically the American practice of providing indemnity for court costs in litigation but not for attorneys' fees. It considers the basics, who pays, the rationals, exceptions,and modifications. It challenges the suggestion that the American no-indemnity practice reflects American values and debunks the assertion that it is used to promote access to justice. The report show that American jurists, just as their non-American counterparts, have pointed to a rational of full realization of rights to support complete indemnity. The reports notes the role of the bar in promoting no indemnity and the importance of viewing litigation as an event separate from the rights that it is to enforce.

Keywords: American rule, English rule, contingent fee, fee-shifting, costs, attorney's fees, legal aid, access to justice

Accepted Paper Series

Date posted: October 07, 2009 ; Last revised: October 07, 2009

Suggested Citation

Maxeiner, James R., Cost and Fee Allocation in Civil Procedure: United States of America National Report (October 4, 2009). International Academy of Comparative Law, 18th World Congress, Washington D.C., July 21-31, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1482843


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

James R. Maxeiner (Contact Author)
University of Baltimore School of Law ( email )
1420 N. Charles Street
Baltimore, MD 21218
United States
410-837-4628 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 70
Downloads: 29

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was served by apollo 6 in 0.094 seconds.