Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1483522
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (283)



 


 



Showing Restraint: Interlocutory Injunctions in Defamation Cases


David Rolph


University of Sydney - Faculty of Law

October 6, 2009

Media and Arts Law Review, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 255-291, 2009
Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 09/102

Abstract:     
The proper test to be applied to the grant of an interlocutory injunction to restrain the publication of defamatory matter is rarely litigated at the highest appellate level. The High Court of Australia's decision in Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O'Neill (2006) 227 CLR 57 provided an opportunity to clarify the applicable principles and potentially to end the division of judicial and academic opinion between what has been characterised as the 'rigid' and the 'flexible' approaches to such relief. This article analyses the reasoning in A.B.C. v O’Neill. It questions whether it can be properly claimed that general equitable principles apply to the grant of injunctions in defamation cases when, in substance, the approach of the majority in A.B.C. v O'Neill appears to treat defamation as a special case. Beyond an engagement with the principles governing injunctive relief in defamation cases, this article argues that A.B.C. v O'Neill raises further, difficult issues of principle, such as the value to be ascribed to freedom of speech; the meaning of ‘trial by media’; the role of reputation in defamation law; and the emerging tension between injunctions to restrain the publication of defamatory matter and invasions of privacy.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 36

Keywords: tort, defamation, Australia, interlocutory injunctions, equitable principles, public interest, public benefit, freedom of speech, prior restraint, trial by media, reputation, privacy

JEL Classification: K10, K13, K30, K41

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: October 7, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Rolph, David, Showing Restraint: Interlocutory Injunctions in Defamation Cases (October 6, 2009). Media and Arts Law Review, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 255-291, 2009; Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 09/102. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1483522

Contact Information

David Rolph (Contact Author)
University of Sydney - Faculty of Law ( email )
Faculty of Law Building, F10
The University of Sydney
Sydney, NSW 2006
Australia
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,112
Downloads: 347
Download Rank: 48,792
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  283

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.375 seconds