Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1484731
 
 

Footnotes (21)



 


 



Supreme Court Usage and the Making of an 'Is'


Minor Myers


Brooklyn Law School

October 1, 2009

Green Bag 2D, Vol. 11, p. 457, Summer 2008
Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper No. 173

Abstract:     
This survey examines use of the phrases “United States is” and “United States are” in opinions of the United States Supreme Court from 1790 to 1919. The familiar claim, popularized by Shelby Foote in the Ken Burns Civil War documentary, is that the Civil War marked a shift in usage from plural to singular. This survey demonstrates that in the Supreme Court this account of the timing of the change is not accurate. Although patterns of usage changed abruptly in the 1860s, justices continued to use the plural form through the end of the nineteenth century. Indeed, the plural usage was the predominant usage in the 1870s, 1880s, and 1890s. Only in the beginning of the twentieth century did the singular usage achieve preeminence and the plural usage disappear almost entirely.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 10

Keywords: Supreme Court, usage, opinion analysis, grammar, history, Civil War

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 2, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Myers, Minor, Supreme Court Usage and the Making of an 'Is' (October 1, 2009). Green Bag 2D, Vol. 11, p. 457, Summer 2008; Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper No. 173. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1484731

Contact Information

Minor Myers (Contact Author)
Brooklyn Law School ( email )
250 Joralemon Street
Brooklyn, NY 11201
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,334
Downloads: 129
Download Rank: 128,519
Footnotes:  21

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.390 seconds