SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

Supreme Court Usage and the Making of an 'Is'

Minor Myers
Brooklyn Law School



Green Bag 2D, Vol. 11, p. 457, Summer 2008
Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper No. 173

Abstract:     
This survey examines use of the phrases “United States is” and “United States are” in opinions of the United States Supreme Court from 1790 to 1919. The familiar claim, popularized by Shelby Foote in the Ken Burns Civil War documentary, is that the Civil War marked a shift in usage from plural to singular. This survey demonstrates that in the Supreme Court this account of the timing of the change is not accurate. Although patterns of usage changed abruptly in the 1860s, justices continued to use the plural form through the end of the nineteenth century. Indeed, the plural usage was the predominant usage in the 1870s, 1880s, and 1890s. Only in the beginning of the twentieth century did the singular usage achieve preeminence and the plural usage disappear almost entirely.

Keywords: Supreme Court, usage, opinion analysis, grammar, history, Civil War

Accepted Paper Series

Date posted: November 02, 2009 ; Last revised: November 02, 2009

Suggested Citation

Myers, Minor, Supreme Court Usage and the Making of an 'Is' (October 1, 2009). Green Bag 2D, Vol. 11, p. 457, Summer 2008; Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper No. 173. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1484731


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Minor Myers (Contact Author)
Brooklyn Law School ( email )
250 Joralemon Street
Brooklyn, NY 11201
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 504
Downloads: 67
Download Rank: 104,097

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo2 in 0.109 seconds.