|
||||
|
||||
Supreme Court Usage and the Making of an 'Is'Minor MyersBrooklyn Law School October 1, 2009 Green Bag 2D, Vol. 11, p. 457, Summer 2008 Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper No. 173 Abstract: This survey examines use of the phrases “United States is” and “United States are” in opinions of the United States Supreme Court from 1790 to 1919. The familiar claim, popularized by Shelby Foote in the Ken Burns Civil War documentary, is that the Civil War marked a shift in usage from plural to singular. This survey demonstrates that in the Supreme Court this account of the timing of the change is not accurate. Although patterns of usage changed abruptly in the 1860s, justices continued to use the plural form through the end of the nineteenth century. Indeed, the plural usage was the predominant usage in the 1870s, 1880s, and 1890s. Only in the beginning of the twentieth century did the singular usage achieve preeminence and the plural usage disappear almost entirely.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 10 Keywords: Supreme Court, usage, opinion analysis, grammar, history, Civil War Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: November 2, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.516 seconds