Iqbal and Bad Apples
Michael C. Dorf
Cornell Law School
October 7, 2009
Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 09-025
As numerous commentators have observed, the Supreme Court’s ruling in Ashcroft v. Iqbal has profound implications for the law of pleading and supervisory liability in civil rights suits. Yet the case is important for the public understanding of American detainee policy as well. Throughout the Bush Administration and continuing into the Obama Administration, the government has sought to portray abusive treatment of detainees as the work of "a few bad apples," even as formerly secret documents reveal what was an official policy of abuse. In deeming the allegation that Iqbal's discriminatory mistreatment was ordered by the former Attorney General and FBI Director not "plausible," the Supreme Court lent its imprimatur to the false but widespread few-bad-apples narrative.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 19working papers series
Date posted: October 8, 2009
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.297 seconds