Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1484978
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (48)



 


 



Iqbal and Bad Apples


Michael C. Dorf


Cornell Law School

October 7, 2009

Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 09-025

Abstract:     
As numerous commentators have observed, the Supreme Court’s ruling in Ashcroft v. Iqbal has profound implications for the law of pleading and supervisory liability in civil rights suits. Yet the case is important for the public understanding of American detainee policy as well. Throughout the Bush Administration and continuing into the Obama Administration, the government has sought to portray abusive treatment of detainees as the work of "a few bad apples," even as formerly secret documents reveal what was an official policy of abuse. In deeming the allegation that Iqbal's discriminatory mistreatment was ordered by the former Attorney General and FBI Director not "plausible," the Supreme Court lent its imprimatur to the false but widespread few-bad-apples narrative.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 19

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: October 8, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Dorf, Michael C., Iqbal and Bad Apples (October 7, 2009). Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 09-025. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1484978 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1484978

Contact Information

Michael C. Dorf (Contact Author)
Cornell Law School ( email )
524 College Ave
Myron Taylor Hall
Ithaca, NY 14853
United States
HOME PAGE: http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/faculty/bio.cfm?id=333
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 738
Downloads: 101
Download Rank: 147,897
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  48

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.500 seconds