Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1486174
 
 

Footnotes (124)



 


 



Geier v. American Honda Motor Co.: A Story of Statutes, Regulation and the Common Law


Peter L. Strauss


Columbia Law School

October 10, 2009

Columbia Public Law Research Paper No. 09-223

Abstract:     
This essay was written as a contribution to one of Foundation's "Story" series. In Geier, a lawsuit had been brought on behalf of a teenager whose injuries from an accident might have been lessened if her car had contained an airbag. Plaintiffs sued on the straightforward basis that the design choice to omit a safety device of proven merit made the car unreasonably hazardous. Federal safety regulations had required the maker of her car to install some such device as an airbag in at least 10% of the cars it made the year it made her car - but her car had only a manual lap-and-shoulder belt (which she had used). Just weeks before her accident, Congress had passed a statute requiring airbags in ALL cars - but not for several model years into the future. In the Supreme Court, whether federal law allowed the case to proceed proved to be a matter as complex as its theory of liability was simple. At issue was a statute that in one section gave the federal government exclusive authority to set auto safety standards and in provided for the saving of common law claims. How did these two provisions interact? The essay shows just how complicated the question was by looking at the history of both design defect liability (still nascent at the time Congress passed the legislation in question) and federal standards on airbags (finally promulgated only after more than a decade of wrangling). Unsurprisingly, this background produced a variety of perspectives - and outcomes - in state and federal cases prior to the suit at issue here. Introducing even further difficulties was a contemporaneous set of Janus-faced Supreme Court decisions on federal pre-emption of state tort law. Only after taking all of these considerations into account does the essay explore the litigation choices of plaintiffs’ and defense counsel, as well as the Geier opinions. Drawing on two very recent Supreme Court decisions invoking the relationship between regulatory and judge-made law, the essay invites the reader to view the case less in terms of conflict between federal prerogatives and state sovereignty, and more as involving the accommodation of the competing modes of lawmaking and the influence of time’s passage in the modern state.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 52

Keywords: federalism, pre-emption, Supreme Court litigation, regulation, savings clause, airbags, auto safety standards, common law and statutes

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 10, 2009 ; Last revised: December 16, 2009

Suggested Citation

Strauss, Peter L., Geier v. American Honda Motor Co.: A Story of Statutes, Regulation and the Common Law (October 10, 2009). Columbia Public Law Research Paper No. 09-223. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1486174 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1486174

Contact Information

Peter L. Strauss (Contact Author)
Columbia Law School ( email )
435 West 116th Street
New York, NY 10025
United States
212-854-2370 (Phone)
212-854-7946 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.columbia.edu/faculty/pstrauss.html
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 626
Downloads: 107
Download Rank: 150,963
Footnotes:  124

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.375 seconds