Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1486194
 
 

References (54)



 


 



European Integration and National Courts - A Strategic Analysis of Judicial Behaviour


Arthur Dyevre


KU Leuven

October 9, 2009


Abstract:     
The present paper looks at the jurisprudence of national courts on the European law doctrines of supremacy and direct effect. Its central hypothesis is that national courts, supreme and constitutional courts in particular, try under the constraints of their institutional system to reconcile two conflicting goals: (1) the necessity to ensure the application and, hence, the supremacy of EU law on a daily basis as a direct and inevitable consequence of EU membership, and (2) the will to keep integration under control by preserving an at least hypothetical last word for the Member States and, thereby, the notion of national sovereignty. This hypothesis provides an explanation both for the overall equilibrium governing the relationship between the ECJ and national courts and for the variations in the way national judges have accommodated direct effect and EU law supremacy.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 52

Keywords: European integration, law, national courts, neo-institutionalism

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 23, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Dyevre, Arthur, European Integration and National Courts - A Strategic Analysis of Judicial Behaviour (October 9, 2009). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1486194 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1486194

Contact Information

Arthur Dyevre (Contact Author)
KU Leuven ( email )
Tiensestraat 41
Leuven, B-3000
Belgium
(+32)472926674 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 724
Downloads: 178
Download Rank: 97,681
References:  54

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.359 seconds