Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1487763
 


 



Romer Revisted or 'the Devil in the Details': Is Georgia's Marriage Amendment Constitutionally Defective?


Lynn Hogue


Georgia State University - College of Law

2005

Florida Coastal Law Review, Vol. 7, p. 255, 2005
Georgia State University College of Law, Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1487763

Abstract:     
A comparison of the language of the various state marriage amendments reveals that the phrasing of Georgia's language is unique in limiting marriage to "only the union of man and woman." While other amendments clearly have a broader focus, prohibiting bigamy and polygamy as well as same-sex unions, Georgia's language uniquely bars only homosexual unions. This paper explores the implications of that uniqueness and the extent to which that singular focus imperils the constitutionality of the amendment, particularly under the standards of Romer v. Evans, as well as Lawrence v. Texas.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 15

Keywords: Romer v. Evans, Georgia, gay marriage, homosexuality, same-sex marriage, constitutional law

JEL Classification: K30, K39

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 13, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Hogue, Lynn, Romer Revisted or 'the Devil in the Details': Is Georgia's Marriage Amendment Constitutionally Defective? (2005). Florida Coastal Law Review, Vol. 7, p. 255, 2005 ; Georgia State University College of Law, Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1487763. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1487763

Contact Information

Lynn Hogue (Contact Author)
Georgia State University - College of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 4037
Atlanta, GA 30302-4037
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 54
Downloads: 8

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.625 seconds