Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1488404
 


 



United States v. Lara - Federal Powers Couched in Terms of Sovereignty and a Relaxation of Prior Restraints


David P. Weber


Creighton University - School of Law

October 1, 2007

North Dakota Law Review, Vol. 83, No. 2, p. 735, 2007

Abstract:     
This article examines the problematic reasoning of the Court in determining the scope of Indian tribes' sovereignty as a jurisdictional matter. By overlooking history, the Court characterizes a delegation of power as a relaxation of a prior restraint, implying no new delegation of power, and therefore concurrent criminal proceedings commenced by a sovereign tribe and by the federal government present no issue of double jeopardy. The article advocates, among other possibilities, the expansion of the scope of tribal jurisdiction to such a point that it could be deemed a near equivalent to federal criminal jurisdiction where such jurisdiction would be based primarily on the traditional rules of minimum contacts present in U.S. jurisprudence.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 31

Keywords: tribal, sovereignty, jurisdiction, Lara, minimum contacts

JEL Classification: k10

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 15, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Weber, David P., United States v. Lara - Federal Powers Couched in Terms of Sovereignty and a Relaxation of Prior Restraints (October 1, 2007). North Dakota Law Review, Vol. 83, No. 2, p. 735, 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1488404

Contact Information

David P. Weber (Contact Author)
Creighton University - School of Law ( email )
2500 California Plaza
Omaha, NE 68178
United States
402 280 3334 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 274
Downloads: 21

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.281 seconds