Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1488997
 
 

Footnotes (250)



 


 



Originalism and Original Exclusions


Mark S. Stein


affiliation not provided to SSRN

October 14, 2009

Kentucky Law Journal, Forthcoming

Abstract:     
In this article, I consider how the interpretation of today’s Constitution should be affected by the antebellum Constitution’s accommodation with slavery and by the limitation of the franchise, at the time of the antebellum Constitution, to a small minority of the adult population. I refer to these defects in the antebellum Constitution and the political system that produced it as “original exclusions.”

In view of these original exclusions, the mere ratification of provisions of the antebellum Constitution cannot imbue them with sufficient moral legitimacy to override contemporary statutes. Thus, a justification for originalism based on notions of popular sovereignty must fail. The original exclusions also straightforwardly defeat the argument that originalism achieves desirable results because the Constitution was produced under supermajoritarian voting rules. In fact, as the Constitution is so hard to amend, and as there has been moral progress since the time of the antebellum Constitution, it makes sense to assume that the original meaning of some remaining antebellum provisions is morally retrograde and undesirable.

The progressive elimination of the original exclusions was accomplished, in part, through nonoriginalist means and has increased the moral legitimacy of the Constitution. As the moral legitimacy of the Constitution derives, in part, from past nonoriginalism, future nonoriginalism should require less justification.

There are some cases in which the text or original meaning of a constitutional provision was plausibly affected by an original exclusion. There are also cases in which application of a constitutional provision specially affects a previously-excluded class. If one or both of these conditions apply, the originalist position becomes even weaker.

Most fundamentally, originalism is objectionable because it seeks to fix the meaning of antebellum provisions in the legal and political culture that produced the original exclusions.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 72

Keywords: Originalism

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: October 15, 2009 ; Last revised: October 26, 2009

Suggested Citation

Stein, Mark S., Originalism and Original Exclusions (October 14, 2009). Kentucky Law Journal, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1488997

Contact Information

Mark S. Stein (Contact Author)
affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )
No Address Available
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 514
Downloads: 100
Download Rank: 159,270
Footnotes:  250

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.313 seconds