Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1489573
 
 

Footnotes (38)



 


 



Is it Important to Be Important?
Evaluating the Supreme Court's Case Selection Process


Frederick Schauer


University of Virginia School of Law

October 15, 2009

Yale Law Journal, Vol. 119, 2009
Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2009-23

Abstract:     
The Supreme Court has been criticized for taking and deciding too few cases, with its current full opinion output down to 70 cases a year from 150 or more as recently as the middle of the 1980s. Much of the criticism has centered around the Court’s reluctance to decide important cases, but sorting out the criticism depends on an understanding of what we mean by “important.” It is true that the Court decides very few of the important issues of our time, and the distance between the Court’s docket and current concerns about health care, jobs, the economy in general, bank bailouts, auto company bailouts, executive compensation, wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the nuclear capability of Iran and North Korea underscore this gap. Current public opinion polling updating Schauer, “Foreword: The Court’s Agenda - and the Nation’s,” 120 Harv. L. Rev. 4 (2006), confirms that there is no change in the gap between the two agendas, and little suggests that there is anything wrong with this. But if we turn from the question of social and political importance to legal importance, it appears that the Court is failing to resolve many of the issues that appear with great frequency in the lower courts, and as to which the law is highly uncertain. The Court’s increasing failure to adequately perform the function of guiding the lower courts is indeed a problem, a problem caused in part by the lack of a way for the Court systematically to obtain accurate information about the array of often-litigated issues in need of resolution. The Essay concludes with possible suggestions on how the informational deficit and informational distortion might be corrected.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 15

Keywords: supreme court, case selection, certiorari, docket

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: October 15, 2009 ; Last revised: October 25, 2009

Suggested Citation

Schauer, Frederick, Is it Important to Be Important? Evaluating the Supreme Court's Case Selection Process (October 15, 2009). Yale Law Journal, Vol. 119, 2009; Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2009-23. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1489573

Contact Information

Frederick Schauer (Contact Author)
University of Virginia School of Law ( email )
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States
434-924-6777 (Phone)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,548
Downloads: 348
Download Rank: 49,774
Footnotes:  38

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.359 seconds